Wolfgangh wrote:Sin City was shit, Frank Miller can't right worth a damm. Thats why it wasn't on my list, its also full of completly needless CG (Yeah we get it, you can do all your backgrounds entirley CG, that doesn't mean you should {See also, Sky Captain and the World of Tomrow})
Agreed
V for Vendetta is debatable as a quality movie, its debatable as a quality comic book movie considering it differs so much from the comic (And the comics writer has openly hated on it) but it did have good actors, wasn't filled with 'pretty people' or holywood cliche's and used almost no CG.
Natalie Portman.
Seriously go hunt down one of the three movies I mentioned, my personal fave was Ghost World but the others are all solid movies too.
Will do.
Saying "All comic book movies are bad" is ignorant, esspecialy when all your experience comes from Superhero movies wich are the most likley to turn into summer blockbusters with no depth (Spiderman, X-men, etc) or just suck on every conceivable level (Ghost Rider, Superman Returns)
No, I give them chances. Every one of them. And I am a huge Marvel fan. And I will always say that they are bad movies. Do I enjoy watching them? Yes! I am a Comic nerd. But do I think they are good movies? Hell no!
And I am not being ignorant: Sin City, Aeonflux (kind of counts), All the Batman movies (ESPECIALLY Batman Begins), CatWoman, The X-Men Trilogy, Judge Dredd, Blade, Constantine, Hulk, The Fantastic 4, Superman, TMNT, Swamp Thing, AvP, Barbwire, The Crow, Garfield, Josie and the Pussy Cats, and LXG are all bad movies. They all lack quality and originality. Come up with your own super heroes! Do your own thing! Don't copy from already existent material and "re-imagine it." It's a stupid way to make movies and most movies that take said approach, are lousy.
Again though, I think a movie should be judged on what it sets out to acheive. A movie like Tank Girl can't be held up to the same standards as Citizen Kane, its unfair. If all the movie sets out to acheive is to be an enjoyable way to spend an hour and a half, and it suceeds, then regardless of how great the cinematography, or how over abundent the CG, or how flat the actors are it should be counted as a good movie. It's like saying Sam and Fuzzy is no Watchmen, so its a crap comic. They are setting out to do two completly diffrent things. It's unfair to judge them by the same standards.
Absolutely! That's why there are genres and different films lead the genres, in terms of quality. However, there are some standards that are universal that count towards making a quality film. And comic films, most always can't hit the mark with those standards.