Deus Rex
Rex knows a lot of good comic-ending one-liners.
We return on Friday with a new comic and a new round of Q and A! As always, if you've got a question you'd like to ask me, just pop it in an email with "Q and A" in the subject line! It can be about Sam and Fuzzy. It can be about my other art or comics work. It can be about what I'm playing lately, or what I ate for breakfast. I'm not your boss!
-Sam Logan
Vamping
Rikk's opportunistic anti-vampire ways were chronicled back in the Aid and Abet chapter! (And the public reveal of vampires happened a bit earlier, in Four Finger Discount.)
Come back on Wednesday for our next comic!
-Sam Logan
Sam and Fuzzy Q & A: Tar Time Edition
Got a question you want answered? Just drop me an email with "Q & A" in the subject line!
"When Raphael was explaining to Rexford what the Tar is and how it works he states, 'If you ask me, history is littered with probable byproducts.' Given that this means that creatures in the past were born from the Tar, what creatures do you imagine he was referring to?" -Eddie
I think it's open to interpretation! But in my mind, the tar is responsible for all the life on Earth that didn't naturally evolve. Or in other words... all the kinds of lifeforms in Sam and Fuzzy that don't exist in our real world. All the "inhumans" in the comic -- from talking cats to vampires to mysteriously re-animated Dinosaurs -- are twists on classic staples of real life human fiction and folklore. In the S&F universe, those products of human imagination were brought to life by the tar.
And speaking of which...
"Loving this climax! Is it too early to talk about the symbolism of the tar? It responds to human thought, it brings to life all of the non-humans in the comic, it's everywhere throughout and surrounding their world... It's the black ink (or, you know, digital ink) you draw with, yes?" -Pat
Haha! I think now is the time to acknowledge it, yes! A couple of people have emailed me about this over the last few weeks.
There was actually a time, way back in the earliest drafts of this whole saga, where the slang term the characters used for the mysterious black substance in the comic was going to be "ink", and it was going to be entirely liquid in appearance. But ultimately, I decided that was maybe a bit on the nose, so I called it tar and gave it an appearance that was a little more stringy than liquidy. I thought that would give it a "primordial ooze" quality that would feel more like a real in-universe thing, rather than just a super meta artist metaphor.
But yes, ultimately, all the fictional life that I added to our universe in order to create the S&F universe was born from a big pit that, in the physical books we will one day print of this story, will be literally full of solid black ink. It's the engine of the creation in the comic, and also the engine of creation of the comic. It's a little indulgent, but so is writing a 3000+ page story about a cab driver and a teddy bear. I couldn't imagine doing it any other way!
"So I saw [the Q & A answer about how the tar monster's eyes correspond to Hart, Brain and Candice], and I have to ask…Is a comparison between Hart, Brain, and Candice on one hand and the concepts of Id, Ego, and Super-ego something that you are deliberately inviting? If not, is it still apt if you think about it?" -Eric
That was not intentional at all! But it is kind of a fun thought, isn't it? I do think the animalistic, unrestrained Hart is almost 100% Id, and obviously Candice is the closest thing that creature has got to a moral center or Super-ego. Brain as the Ego is probably where the metaphor is the least clean... I think he's only interested in societal norms and the needs of others in as much as they can be manipulated to get what he wants long term, rather than any concern about behaving in a socially acceptable way.
Still, it does work kind of unexpectedly well! And it's funny that I also stacked them in that order, with Hart at the bottom and Brain at the top!
We return on Monday with our next comic. See you then!
-Sam Logan
